So who got naked better? Kim K. or Paris? While Kim K, posed naked for Paper Magazine first, despite the pearls and jewelleries & satin gloves her shot still ends up looking distasteful. Her facial expression, the pose , the baby oil & the focus on the buttocks conveys everything else but art or fashion. On the other hand Paris Hilton shoot is minimal, we have sleecked back hair, and somewhat of a fashion sense. What is particularly interesting here is that we have a case of the student dethroning the master.But is that really true?? There’s no doubt Kim Kardashian’s cover was indeed more popular. However does popularity makes you more financially sucessfull in 2016? Well according to Forbes, Kim Kardashian has a net worth of 85 million dollars while Paris Hilton has a net worth of 100 million dollars. This goes to show that trendiness does not necessarly translate into more cash. In this particular situation we can clearly see, that a somewhat polished and tamed image like that of Paris Hilton’s, still goes a long way and leads to more financial gain overtime. What do you think ??Leave your thoughts below!

I definitely like the Paris Hilton photo. Is in much better taste
I absolutely agree!